Too many systems, no big picture — and every change feels risky.

Grown IT landscapes create decision paralysis: nobody dares change anything because nobody knows the dependencies. The result — everything stays as it is and becomes more fragile every year.

What is reviewed

Inventory — systems, interfaces, data flows, dependencies. What exists, what is redundant, what is critical.
Risks — single points of failure, outdated components, unclear responsibilities.
Decision matrix — which systems stay, which migrate, which get replaced — and in what order.

What you get

Target architecture — documented, traceable, ready for decision-making.
Migration phases — with dependencies, risks and sequencing.
Roadmap 30 / 90 / 180 days — prioritised steps with clear milestones.
Executive summary — for management or board, without technical jargon.

Typical triggers

Tool Sprawl

Every department introduced its own solutions. Data sits in silos, interfaces are undocumented, and nobody has the full picture.

Migration Pressure

End-of-life systems, vendor switches or cloud migration are coming — but there is no roadmap.

Audit / Compliance

Regulatory requirements or internal audits demand documented architecture and traceable decisions.

Process

Context
Stakeholder conversations: what works, what doesn't, what's coming. Goal definition and scope.
Analysis
Technical inventory: systems, interfaces, data flows, dependencies. Interviews with key people.
Target
Design target architecture, define migration phases, assess risks. Create 30/90/180 roadmap.
Handover
Documentation, executive summary and recommendation. Optional: support during first migration phase.